An Analysis of Approximate Knowledge Compilation
نویسنده
چکیده
Knowledge compilat ion is the process by which an in i t ia l theory w i th respect to which inference is intractable is transformed into one or more "approximate" or equivalent theories w i th respect to which inference can be performed efficiently. Selman and Kautz introduced Horn lowest upper bound (LUB) approximations in [SK91], and generalized them in [KS91; SK95] to a number of target languages other than Horn. In this paper, we analyze the problem of knowledge compilat ion for arbi trary clausal target languages, generalizing in several ways previous results. We provide general characterizations of the L U B that are independent of the target language; analyze the properties of the Generate-LUB algor i thm of Selman and Kautz, proving its correctness for any target language closed under subsumption (including a wide fami ly of languages which guarantee polynomial size approximations); and generalize the procedure to arbi t rary target languages. We also examine some computat ional aspects of these procedures and the quality of Horn approximations.
منابع مشابه
Approximate Knowledge Compilation : The First Order
Knowledge compilation procedures make a knowledge base more explicit so as make inference with respect to the compiled knowledge base tractable or at least more eecient. Most work to date in this area has been restricted to the propositional case, despite the importance of rst order theories for expressing knowledge concisely. Focusing on (LUB) approximate compilation (Selman and Kautz 1991), o...
متن کاملA Survey on Knowledge Compilation
Knowledge compilation is an AI technique for addressing computationally demanding reasoning problems. In this paper we survey recent results in knowledge compilation of propositional knowledge bases. We first define and limit the scope of such a technique, then we survey exact and approximate knowledge compilation methods. We include a discussion of compilation for non-monotonic knowledge bases.
متن کاملCompilation for Critically onstrained Knowledge
We show that many “critically constrained” Random 3SAT knowledge bases (KBs) can be compiled into disjunctive normal form easily by using a variant of the “Davis-Putnam” proof procedure. From these compiled KBs we can answer all queries about entailment of conjunctive normal formulas, also easily compared to a “bruteforce” approach to approximate knowledge compilation into unit clauses for the ...
متن کاملCompilation for Critically Constrained Knowledge Bases
We show that many \critically constrained" Random 3SAT knowledge bases (KBs) can be compiled into disjunctive normal form easily by using a variant of the \Davis-Putnam" proof procedure. From these compiled KBs we can answer all queries about entailment of conjunctive normal formulas, also easily | compared to a \brute-force" approach to approximate knowledge compilation into unit clauses for t...
متن کاملApproximate assertional reasoning over expressive ontologies
In the Semantic Web, ontologies provide the required vocabulary for a meaningful and machine-understandable interpretation of data. Nowadays, expressive ontologies are usually written in the W3C standard language called the Web Ontology Language (OWL). In order to leverage the full power of OWL for emerging Semantic Web applications, ontology reasoning holds a key position by allowing access to...
متن کاملPanel on \ Knowledge Compilation and Approximation " : Terminology , Questions
It is well known that problems in Logic, Automated Deduction and Artiicial Intelligence are very much demanding from the computational point of view. Two of the techniques that have been proposed for addressing such computational diiculties are Knowledge Compilation and Knowledge Approximation. The central idea of the former technique is to split the goal of answering to the question whether a ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1995